What it means to be queer has become a frequent discussion not only among my students but also among my peers who had long ago embraced LGBT identities. Reclaiming the term “queer” from the realm of pejoratives, which had once signified the right to and pride in living lives unfettered from heteronormativity, suddenly held new possibilities, particularly in the context of a tide driving LGBT people into normalcy. While no one regretted the demise of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell or the Defense of Marriage Act, the prospect of a new normativity raised issues about the desirability of that status.

In a Spring 2013 course I taught at Parsons called “Homonormativity and the American Ideal,” art historian and artist Catherine Lord visited my class, to speak about “To Whom It May Concern…”a site-specific installation she had created at the One Archives in Los Angeles. That project focused on dedication pages in the books the archive had collected. She talked about the color of the pages, the typeface, the bleeding print, the telegraphing of indecipherable massages that conveyed biography, politics, intentions, passions, fears, and other qualities. She talked about the power and “queerness” of those pieces of paper. Often those pages were not only different in design and content from the rest of the book, they possessed an autonomy that often inflected readings of the texts that followed. It was about that time that I began thinking about grounding future queer as a project would de-stabilize the ways in which we see our environment, and foreground approaches that demand, in some cases, attention to the details of the worlds they critique and the visions they present; in others an openness to the spirits they embody.

The works on view in grounding future queer represent a mining of The New School Art Collection for works by artists whose work and lived experience present options to heterosexual norms. From more than a two thousand works in The New School Art Collection, spanning a period of 85 years, these works were made by an international group of practitioners between the period 1929 to 2012 who have experienced changing political circumstances and cultural responses to issues pertaining to sexuality and gender.

The works run the gamut from the 1929 allegorical work of Russian émigré Pavel Tchelitchew to the 2012 work of Aziz & Cucher responding to the complexities of their responses to turmoil in the Middle East, from the minimalist image of a poem about a young man’s abuse by John Giorno to works by Frank Moore, David Wojnarowicz and Ross Bleckner that are direct responses to the devastation of the AIDS epidemic, from the work of Joan Snyder who calls out the names of Biblical women to a photograph by Catherine Opie recording performance artist Ron Athey creating scarification on the back of Divinity Fudge (a.k.a. Darryl Carlton.) Together, they lay bare the contradictions and ambiguities of defining queer experience while simultaneously peeling away the assumptions that underlie our world.

Tony Whitfield, Curator of grounding future queer

This blog has been created to provide an ongoing context for discussion of the individual works in grounding future queer as well as other related works in The New School Art Collection. Please contribute any thoughts you have about the ways in which these works inform our understanding of queer culture as well as any information you might have about these works.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Marlene McCarty













Marlene McCarty
Bend Over I’ll Drive (Honk)
Heat transfer on canvas in five parts
1990
Gift of Marianne G. Johnson

1 comment:

  1. Bend Over I’ll Drive (Honk), 1990, is a text-based work squarely positioned in the political and feminist art of the late 80s and early 90s. Stylistically reminiscent of artists like Barbara Kruger during the same time period, McCarty’s bumper sticker slogans are a slightly more humorous example of how artists strategically used advertising techniques to bring AIDS awareness as well as lesbian and gay issues into mainstream discourse and catalyze direct political action.

    McCarty was a member of AIDS activist collective Gran Fury, a group of artists that worked in tandem with ACT UP (Aids Coalition to Unleash Power) and helped create and propagate some now iconic slogans such as Silence=Death – originally created for The New Museum in 1987. Her bumper sticker slogans demonstrate the in-your-face propaganda aesthetic that reflected the urgency of AIDS activism and the emergence of queer political action and speak directly to the Catholic Church’s stand against safer sex education.

    Bend Over I’ll Drive (Honk) enters a dialogical relationship with other works in The New School collection, such as Robert Indiana’s Love (1965), which was later appropriated as AIDS (1987) by Canadian art group General Idea. But how does this piece translate in an era of marriage equality and post-feminism? The message of Bend Over may transcend time as it elicits responses to contemporary questions of identity, politics, power and religion. Although McCarty’s more recent work is a dramatic departure from her early aesthetic, she continues to explore provocative subjects and themes of sexuality, female-identity and violence.

    Colleen Siviter
    Bend Over I’ll Drive (Honk), 1990, is a text-based work squarely positioned in the political and feminist art of the late 80s and early 90s. Stylistically reminiscent of artists like Barbara Kruger during the same time period, McCarty’s bumper sticker slogans are a slightly more humorous example of how artists strategically used advertising techniques to bring AIDS awareness as well as lesbian and gay issues into mainstream discourse and catalyze direct political action.

    McCarty was a member of AIDS activist collective Gran Fury, a group of artists that worked in tandem with ACT UP (Aids Coalition to Unleash Power) and helped create and propagate some now iconic slogans such as Silence=Death – originally created for The New Museum in 1987. Her bumper sticker slogans demonstrate the in-your-face propaganda aesthetic that reflected the urgency of AIDS activism and the emergence of queer political action and speak directly to the Catholic Church’s stand against safer sex education.

    Bend Over I’ll Drive (Honk) enters a dialogical relationship with other works in The New School collection, such as Robert Indiana’s Love (1965), which was later appropriated as AIDS (1987) by Canadian art group General Idea. But how does this piece translate in an era of marriage equality and post-feminism? The message of Bend Over may transcend time as it elicits responses to contemporary questions of identity, politics, power and religion. Although McCarty’s more recent work is a dramatic departure from her early aesthetic, she continues to explore provocative subjects and themes of sexuality, female-identity and violence.

    Colleen Siviter






    ReplyDelete